- Nerd Out on Business
- Posts
- Mad Men in the Real World. The Story of WPP.
Mad Men in the Real World. The Story of WPP.
The world's former #1 ad holding company runs separate P&Ls, tech stacks, and cultures for every acquisition. Now they're bleeding talent, losing clients, and learning that $381M in AI can't fix what Mad Men-era management broke.
Today, I'm looking at WPP. They are one of the largest advertising agencies in the world and it’s commonly believed some of it’s past executives were the inspiration for the hit TV show Mad Men.
The quick hits:
Martin Sorrell bought a basket manufacturer for $658K in 1985
Hostile takeovers of J. Walter Thompson and Ogilvy built the empire
400+ acquisitions later, revenue hit $18.7 billion
Lost the #1 spot to Publicis in 2023 after years of decline
Now betting $381M annually that AI can save them
A few takeaways:
The rollup trap: WPP acquired 400+ companies but never integrated them. Result? All the complexity, none of the synergies. Operating margins stuck at 15% despite massive scale.
Culture beats strategy: When your CEO calls rival CEOs "odious little shits" and gets caught up in brothel scandals, that toxicity cascades. WPP paid $19M in corruption fines across four countries.
AI plus headcount reductions create complexity: They're spending $381M on AI while cutting 6,000 jobs. WPP is mostly a "people business". Dramatic headcount reductions in a relationship-driven business like this can blow up morale.
The full breakdown shows how WPP's story mirrors every service business at scale: the tension between entrepreneurial freedom and operational efficiency. Spoiler: you eventually have to pick one.
With that, I'll see you tomorrow!
Nick
TL;DR
Martin Sorrell transformed a $658,000 wire basket manufacturer into the world's largest ad empire worth $19 billion at peak
Built through 400+ acquisitions but never truly integrated them—maintaining separate P&Ls, cultures, and tech stacks
Revenue declined 2.3% in 2024 despite $381 million annual AI investment; operating margins compressed from 17.5% to 15%
Three key competitive advantages: Scale (buying $60B in media annually), Brand portfolio (Ogilvy, Grey, VMLY&R), and Data flywheel (5 billion adult reach)
Entrepreneurs can learn: rollup strategies work financially but fail operationally without integration courage
The 30,000-Foot View
WPP operates as the world's largest advertising and marketing services company, though it recently lost that crown to Publicis. The business model is deceptively simple: win client contracts, charge 15-20% margins on media spend, and sell strategic/creative services at 40-50% margins.
Revenue streams:
Global Integrated Agencies (42%): Ogilvy, VMLY&R, Grey
GroupM media agencies (38%): Mindshare, Wavemaker, MediaCom
Public Relations (8%): Hill & Knowlton, BCW, Finsbury Glover Hering
Specialist Agencies (12%): AKQA, design consultancies, production
Key stats:
Market cap: $9.91 billion (down from $19 billion peak)
TTM revenue: $18.67 billion
Gross margin: 83%
Net income: $799 million (2024)
Employees: 108,000 (down from 134,000 in 2019)
Industry: Advertising & Marketing Services
Company History
1985: Martin Sorrell invests $317,500 in Wire and Plastic Products plc, a basket manufacturer
1987: Hostile takeover of J. Walter Thompson for $566 million shocks Madison Avenue
1989: Hostile takeover of Ogilvy Group for $864 million; David Ogilvy calls Sorrell "odious little shit"
2000: Acquires Young & Rubicam for $5.7 billion, largest ad industry deal ever
2008: Overtakes Omnicom as world's largest advertising company
2018: Sorrell resigns amid scandal; Mark Read becomes CEO
2023: Loses #1 position to Publicis after years of revenue decline
2024: Announces Read departure; Microsoft exec Cindy Rose named new CEO
2025: Major restructuring underway, merging agencies and cutting 6,000+ jobs
Show Me the Money
Stand-out financial features:
Operating profit surged 219% in 2024 but due to one-time gains
Net debt remains high at $4.6 billion (2.5x EBITDA)
CapEx declining as company cuts physical footprint
Free cash flow conversion strong at 85% of operating profit
Financial Data
Metric | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | TTM |
---|---|---|---|---|
Revenue | $18,320M | $18,861M | $18,260M | $18,260M |
Gross Profit | $15,154M | $15,601M | $15,157M | $15,157M |
Gross Margin | 82.7% | 82.7% | 83.0% | 83.0% |
Ops Profit | $1,966M | $2,008M | $2,539M | $2,539M |
Ops Margin | 10.7% | 10.6% | 13.9% | 13.9% |
CapEx | $411M | $441M | $398M | $398M |
Net Debt | $4,945M | $5,450M | $4,628M | $4,628M |
The N.O.O.B. Nine — Competitive Powers
The Nerd Out on Business Nine is made up of Hamliton Helmer's famous "7 Powers" of competitive advantage (Scale Economies, Network Economies, Counter-Positioning, Switching Costs, Branding, Cornered Resource, and Process Power) combined with two of my own (Data Flywheel and Distribution Advantage).
Power | Score | Rationale |
---|---|---|
Branding | 4.5/5 | Agency brands (Ogilvy, Grey) carry enormous weight; 307 Fortune 500 clients |
Data Flywheel | 4/5 | 5 billion adult reach with trillions of signals improving AI models |
Process Power | 3/5 | Production Studio and AI tools create efficiency but not differentiation |
Scale Economies | 4/5 | GroupM buys $60B in media annually, achieving 5-15% better rates |
Switching Costs | 2/5 | Deep relationships but Mars and Coca-Cola defections prove they're not sticky |
Cornered Resource | 3/5 | Exclusive talent and data partnerships but nothing rivals can't replicate |
Network Economies | 2/5 | Limited network effects between agencies; clients use one, not all |
Counter-Positioning | 2/5 | Plays same game as rivals, just at larger scale |
Distribution Advantage | 2/5 | Global presence but consultancies and in-housing erode advantage |
Average Score: 2.9/5 - WPP has scale and data advantages but lacks true differentiation in an increasingly commoditized industry.
Memorable Marketing
WPP's agencies created culture-defining campaigns, but the holding company itself markets poorly. Key campaigns that showcase capabilities:
Dove "Real Beauty" (2004) - Ogilvy challenged beauty standards, growing Dove from $2B to $4B in three years. Generated $150M in earned media through emotional resonance and social sharing. The "Real Beauty Sketches" became YouTube's most-watched ad with 163M views.
"Share a Coke" (2014) - Grey replaced Coca-Cola logo with 250 popular names, driving 2% U.S. sales increase after decade of decline. Campaign spread to 80+ countries, proving personalization at scale works.
WPP's Own Rebranding Disaster (2023) - Attempted to rebrand media agencies under "WPP Media," causing internal revolt and client confusion. Reversed within months, showing even marketing giants struggle with their own brand.
Tactical Takeaways:
Test controversial ideas in small markets before global rollout
Personalization beats generalization even for mass brands
Earned media often outperforms paid when message resonates
Don't fix what isn't broken (agency brand equity matters)
AI Uses & Opportunities
Current AI initiatives center on the $381M annual investment in WPP Open platform:
Production Studio with NVIDIA reduces content review times by 90%
Open Intelligence analyzes trillions of signals across 5 billion adults
21,000 employees completed AI certifications in 2024
Future opportunities remain massive but require cultural shift:
Automated campaign optimization could cut client costs 50%
Predictive analytics could identify trending topics before competitors
AI-powered creative testing could eliminate guesswork
Natural language interfaces could democratize data analysis
The challenge: WPP cut 6,000 jobs while investing in AI, creating internal resistance. Technology without adoption is expensive decoration.
Bumps in the Road
2021 Corruption Settlement: Paid $19.1M to SEC for systematic bribery in India, China, Brazil, Peru
2018 JWT Sexual Harassment: CEO allegedly made rape threats; WPP initially defended him
Sorrell's Exit: Departed amid allegations of misusing funds at brothel (denied)
Client Losses: Mars ($1.7B), Coca-Cola North America ($800M), Ford creative—all to Publicis
Integration Failures: $1.52B impairment on Wunderman Thompson, $657M on Y&R, $301M on AKQA
Talent Exodus: 15,000 employees signed petition against office mandate; key leaders joining rivals
Your Swipe File
What to steal:
Build a data flywheel—every client interaction should improve your product
Preserve acquired brand equity even at operational cost
Invest in one platform/capability at scale rather than spreading thin
Use financial engineering to fund growth but operations to sustain it
What to avoid:
Don't acquire without integration plan
Avoid "synergy" promises you can't deliver—markets remember
Don't let founders run acquired companies without controls
Never choose complexity when simplicity would work
Don't confuse AI investment with digital transformation